Evidence layer · integrations first

Make interconnection security auditable before it reaches the borrowing base.

Normalize changing provider rules, executed project documents and cash/LOC/security evidence into a reproducible collateral tape—with exact source versions, factual refundability patterns, exceptions and a separate lender-policy result.

A factual workpaper engine, not a replacement lending platform.

Existing interconnection, project-finance and ABL systems keep their jobs. The Monitor supplies a source-versioned evidence refresh/QA layer when that work is not already automated internally.

Resolve the rule stack

ISO/RTO or balancing authority, TO/TSP/utility, tariff or BPM version, queue-process version, executed agreement requirement and any sourced facility-specific override.

Reconcile the security

Cash, LOC, surety or supported security; draws, releases, study-cost offsets, replacement instruments, evidence age and missing-document exceptions.

Export lender-ready evidence

CSV/API-shaped tape plus JSON evidence packet containing rule IDs, provider snapshot hashes, project-document hashes/locators, balance trace, provider fact and separate lender-policy treatment.

Coverage built around provider stacks, not six logos.

Centralized rules are never assumed to answer facility-specific questions. ERCOT/Oncor is deliberately fail-closed unless sourced project terms provide the missing fact.

MISO + Ameren reference TO

DPP/BPM and milestone-security facts with source-version selection.

PJM + Dominion reference TO

Current Manual 14H readiness-deposit logic and explicitly qualified adverse-study events.

SPP + Evergy reference TO

Attachment V conditional retention/refund patterns and security forms.

Idaho Power

Cluster-process deposits, readiness progression and multiple accepted security forms.

CAISO + PG&E

Current CAISO tariff financial security plus PG&E transmission interconnection requirements.

ERCOT + Oncor

SGIA/TSP financial-security requirement with project-document terms required for refundability.

One row for the spreadsheet. Full provenance behind it.

The normalized tape is compact enough for lenders' existing models, while the evidence packet preserves the rule and document trail needed to reproduce the result.

Fail closed by design. Missing evidence, wrong effective dates, unsupported instruments and delegated project-document terms do not become favorable assumptions.
project_id: DEV-001
provider_stack: PJM-DEV-2026
verified_balance: 1,000,000
refundability: partially_refundable
provider_status: verified
applied_rule: PJM-M14H-R04-2026-05-20
loan_policy: eligible
policy_haircut: 0.50
eligible_collateral: 500,000
source_hashes: sha256:…

Designed to integrate

  • Spreadsheet / CSV import
  • JSON/API payloads
  • Generic ABL collateral engines
  • Project-finance and project-management systems
  • Interconnection workflow platforms

Intentionally outside scope

  • Lien perfection or priority
  • Assignment enforceability
  • Bankruptcy treatment
  • Disputed tariff/refund rights
  • Credit or financing recommendations
Pricing hypothesis · not customer validated

Evidence Validation Sprint — $18,000

Up to 25 facilities, two covered provider stacks, one lender-authored policy, source snapshot pack, collateral tape, evidence packets, exception register and one spreadsheet/API mapping workshop. The next step is a buyer conversation—not a claim that this price or workflow has been validated.

Request a workflow comparison
Start with process, not confidential data

Request a workflow comparison.

Tell us who you are and where interconnection-security evidence creates repeat work. We will start with the synthetic/redacted sample—not a request for project documents.

Get the redacted sample

Do not submit confidential project, borrower, lender, security, agreement or personal data through this form. Business contact requests are retained for up to 90 days for follow-up.