Steward Creek ownership-transition gate

Post-sale TerraForm/PJM events are technical observations unless the former Hexagon/Great Bay interconnection instrument is explicitly shown to survive or transfer. The preferred retrospective unit is a pre-sale Great Bay-supported security event. See the continuity gate.

Capital-instrument attribution

A project/provider match is not enough when one capital provider has multiple exposures. Steward Creek now fails closed before sale/repayment economics without explicit instrument binding. See the attribution gate.

Steward Creek financing-scope conflict

Great Bay names Steward Creek, while other transaction-side sources describe a broader Hexagon PJM portfolio. Inclusion is preserved; exclusive financed population and event allocation remain unresolved. See the financing-scope gate.

Steward Creek event-unit acquisition

A named financed PJM project now provides the strongest public acquisition bridge, but specific Great Bay-financed security events remain unbound. See the event-unit gate.

No retrospective shadow is execution-ready

SolUnesco remains the first measurement-design candidate, but CP separates design priority from acquisition readiness: exact financed membership, process-regime binding and at least two completed same-regime units must be confirmed before any historical shadow. See the measurement-acquisition gate.

SolUnesco process-regime measurement gate

The four-project transaction remains the cleanest retrospective candidate, but Southern Companies Order No. 2023 regime binding and a >=2 same-regime completed unit now precede economics shadow design. See the gate.

Overlay lender route: disposition negative control

Overlay is now used to falsify downstream reuse, not as the default direct contracting route. See the disposition gate.

Overlay Illinois repeat-workflow gate

Three tightly clustered Illinois interconnection-deposit facilities make Overlay the first operational/control-seat falsifier, but public underwriting sophistication creates a high build threat. See the repeat-workflow kill gate.

Cross-advisor transaction preflight

Catalina and Range now establish a cross-advisor exact-category falsifier. Default packaging is developer-contracted factual preflight with advisor downstream disposition; direct advisor procurement remains unearned. See the packaging and measurement gate.

Advisor transaction preflight

Catalina now earns a pre-close cross-deal factual preflight falsifier; post-close advisor monitoring is not publicly earned. See the transaction-preflight gate.

Advisor-channel discovery

Catalina has repeat public advisory exposure to exact interconnection-financing transactions across different borrowers and capital providers. This earns a cross-deal schema falsifier, not a buyer or pilot assumption. See the advisor-channel gate.

Current-regime revenue discovery

Gridi/Rosemawr leads future zero-data discovery because the facility is post-SLOC-reform and the borrower publicly owns utility-study and financing functions. Current public pipeline scope has drifted, so sponsor pages are explicitly not the financed register. RIC remains the named-owner legacy-regime comparator. Neither is a pilot. See the regime-fit and scope-drift gate.

Current commercial scope: interconnection security state

Post-reform financing still exists, but cash deposits are no longer the whole state machine. The primary commercial object now covers project/facility binding plus cash or SLOC state, replacements, conversion milestones, draws, releases/refunds and preserved exceptions. Deposit borrowing-base evidence remains a subset. See the scope reframe.

Discovery priority

Revenue discovery, operational falsification, demo readiness and paid-pilot readiness remain separate rankings. See the discovery-priority gate.

RIC security-mode requalification

New York SLOC reform now precedes RIC process/event economics. First determine whether the current Rosemawr relationship supports cash, SLOC, later cash conversion or a mixed security workflow; public rule/form logic is $0 buyer value. See the security-mode gate.

RIC process-family gate

RIC remains first revenue discovery, but New York process partition now precedes event economics. See the SIR-family gate.

Interconnection Security-State Evidence Monitor

First retrospective measurement-design cohort

SolUnesco / Great Bay / Catalina now leads economics-measurement design because the public financing population is explicitly bounded at four projects. Gridi remains first revenue discovery. See the measurement-priority gate.

Current revenue-discovery seat: borrower first, lender mirror second

Fresh two-sided ownership evidence moves the RIC Energy / Rosemawr New York relationship ahead of a lender-first conversation. RIC publicly exposes both interconnection and capital-markets operating seats; Rosemawr remains the mirror reviewer/control-owner test. This is discovery sequencing, not a payer conclusion. See the two-sided seat gate.

First authorized revenue discovery

RIC Energy / Rosemawr leads, but current security mode must be requalified before process/event economics. Rosemawr is a mirror reviewer/control-authorizer test; no payer or pilot is presumed.

See the current discovery sequence

NineDot public population ceiling

Current EIA candidate rows (22 / 91.3 MW) do not reconcile to Natixis public financing aggregates (28 / 124 MW). Public project-name mining is stopped; explicit project-to-facility binding is required before any transition demo.

See the population-congruence stop rule

Current operational discovery: capital-stack transition

NineDot now leads current borrower-side discovery: public financing evidence spans interconnection-deposit funding into later construction financing, while a current Capital Markets role owns draws, project additions and lender reporting. No public project binding across facilities is inferred.

See the transition gate

Facility-state freshness

The PowerBank observation chain is historical: March 31 is the latest reviewed authoritative drawn balance, and current post-period state is unresolved.

See the freshness gate

Current BN gate: facility population identity

Financed facility population, sponsor pipeline, named public sites and utility queues are separate objects. Convergent remains discovery #2, but zero named public projects are currently bound to its 16-project NYGB facility population. See the population gate.

Current CA gate: facility overlap / instrument migration

NineDot remains current operational discovery #1, but public evidence does not show whether interconnection obligations remain under Deutsche, migrate into Natixis, release/refund, or coexist. No transition demo is allowed until a project and instrument state are actually bound.

See the overlap/migration gate

Interconnection evidence event feed · existing finance systems stay in place

Normalize material interconnection evidence events before reviewers rebuild them by hand.

Emit source-bound interconnection deposit, security and project transitions—with provider-rule version, source-digest provenance and fail-closed exceptions—into the existing credit or portfolio system you already use.

Interconnection-specific evidence events for the finance system you already use.

The primary deliverable is an Interconnection Evidence Event Feed: vendor-neutral, source-versioned factual transitions for deposit posting, project additions, security changes, milestone/refundability changes and source-version updates. Existing interconnection, project-finance and private-credit systems retain storage, workflow, approvals, audit logs, alerts, dashboards and borrowing-base logic. Annexes and re-performance receipts remain optional reviewer views over the same event chain and can still attach to an existing funding workflow.

Resolve the rule stack

ISO/RTO or balancing authority, TO/TSP/utility, tariff or BPM version, queue-process version, executed agreement requirement and any sourced facility-specific override.

Reconcile the security

Cash, LOC, surety or supported security; draws, releases, study-cost offsets, replacement instruments, evidence age and missing-document exceptions.

Export factual evidence

Factual-only CSV/JSON handoff containing stable IDs, source/rule hashes, evidence gaps, DX/DY/DZ/DW control states and exception lineage. Credit eligibility, haircuts and borrowing-base decisions stay in the buyer's existing system.

Coverage built around provider stacks, not six logos.

Centralized rules are never assumed to answer facility-specific questions. ERCOT/Oncor is deliberately fail-closed unless sourced project terms provide the missing fact.

MISO + Ameren reference TO

DPP/BPM and milestone-security facts with source-version selection.

PJM + Dominion reference TO

Current Manual 14H readiness-deposit logic and explicitly qualified adverse-study events.

SPP + Evergy reference TO

Attachment V conditional retention/refund patterns and security forms.

Idaho Power

Cluster-process deposits, readiness progression and multiple accepted security forms.

CAISO + PG&E

Current CAISO tariff financial security plus PG&E transmission interconnection requirements.

ERCOT + Oncor

SGIA/TSP financial-security requirement with project-document terms required for refundability.

One factual row for the existing system. Full provenance behind it.

The factual-only summary is compact enough for an existing spreadsheet or receiving object, while the canonical handoff preserves rule/source hashes, evidence gaps and exception lineage. Credit eligibility and borrowing-base decisions stay in the buyer's existing system.

Fail closed by design. Missing evidence, wrong effective dates, unsupported instruments and delegated project-document terms do not become favorable assumptions.
project_id: DEV-001
provider_stack: PJM-DEV-2026
source_supported_balance: 1,000,000
provider_status: verified
applied_rule: PJM-M14H-R04-2026-05-20
source_ids: PJM-M14H
source_hashes: sha256:…
fact_support_coverage_state: SYNTHETIC_UNMEASURED_NOT_SUPPORT_COVERAGE_PROOF
missing_evidence: none
factual_exception_codes: none
credit_decision: NOT_PRODUCED

Designed to integrate

  • Spreadsheet / CSV import
  • JSON/API payloads
  • Existing credit / portfolio systems as factual input only
  • Project-finance and project-management systems
  • Interconnection workflow platforms
  • Horning public evidence workpaper

Intentionally outside scope

  • Lien perfection or priority
  • Assignment enforceability
  • Bankruptcy treatment
  • Disputed tariff/refund rights
  • Credit or financing recommendations
Commercial hypothesis · not customer validated

Map specialized interconnection events into the existing system.

Factual Handoff Measurement — not pilot-ready and unpriced. If later authorized, reproduce a bounded completed-event cohort, emit source-bound factual records, and test lossless mapping into the buyer's existing spreadsheet/API/data object. No second dashboard, credit engine or borrowing-base workflow is part of the offer.

Compare source hunting, reconstruction, re-keying, independent re-performance, exception preservation and integration effort by event class. There is no default public price; pricing follows measured material-transition mix, non-duplicated value, delivery effort and procurement cost.

Economic + procurement gate: require quantified buyer value, event recurrence, authorizer, contractual payer, economic bearer, procurement/security path and an approved data environment. Value alone is not sufficient; the integration and security path must also be viable. If the current system already stores equivalent source-bound interconnection transitions at negligible marginal cost, or quantified value cannot clear the economic gate, or the current process is already cheaper, reject the paid pilot for that scope.

See the synthetic event feedRead the data & decision boundary
Start with process, not confidential data

Request a workflow comparison.

Tell us who you are and where interconnection-security evidence creates repeat work. We will start with the synthetic/redacted sample—not a request for project documents.

Get the redacted sample

Do not submit confidential project, borrower, lender, security, agreement or personal data through this form. Business contact requests are retained for up to 90 days for follow-up.

Integration-first positioning

Current competitive evidence rejects another system of record or generic borrowing-base verifier. The surviving wedge is a bounded source-linked factual reconciliation that plugs into the stack already in place.

See the integration-first boundary

Event-first evidence, not another static register

The canonical layer preserves source-bound before/after transitions when deposits are posted, projects are added, security changes, milestones change evidence state, or collateral is redeployed. Annexes and independent re-performance receipts are views over that event chain.

View synthetic event-ledger proof

Downstream disposition measurement

Counsel repeatability gate

Cross-facility schema stress test

Operational owner gate

Rosemawr cross-facility paid-route falsifier

Rosemawr four-facility repeatability

Rosemawr recurring-operations gate

Rosemawr public event observability

PowerBank facility observation chain

Component-level value attribution control

Cohort admission / anti-cherry-pick control

Population completeness / denominator-integrity control

Identity before currentness

Economic-object continuity gate: bind the financed project/provider/facility/instrument chain before temporal, close or integration claims.

Document set before currentness

Governing document-chain gate: a current fact requires a complete bounded base/amendment/waiver/replacement source set, not just a recent document.

Conflict before currentness

Fact-conflict preservation gate: after the governing source set is complete, contradictory factual claims remain explicit exceptions unless a source explicitly corrects/replaces/restates the value.

Trusted source-ingress provenance

A source hash proves byte identity, not who supplied the source. EA requires an accepted provenance basis before material private/current facts enter conflict/currentness controls.

See the source-ingress provenance gate

Fact-support coverage

A current factual value is not treated as fully substantiated just because one source is relevant. Every predeclared required evidence role must be covered or the fact becomes an explicit unknown.

See the fact-support coverage gate

New: Interconnection Evidence Annex

A synthetic source-versioned annex designed to attach to an existing draw, project-addition or refresh package. It deliberately does not recreate the funding request or borrowing-base calculation.

View the synthetic annex

Two control states, one evidence chain

The same interconnection evidence can be prepared upstream and independently re-performed downstream without confusing the two roles. A prepared annex does not claim independence; a control receipt does not make a credit or legal decision.

View the synthetic dual-control annex

Control economics

See why borrower preparation and lender control do not automatically create two value claims.

Open the synthetic control-economics model

Interconnection Evidence Event Feed

Current commercial proof: vendor-neutral, source-bound interconnection transitions designed for the finance system you already use—not another dashboard or borrowing-base engine.

Open the synthetic integration feed

Source-admission control

Production-like provider events block when the authoritative source is known stale or freshness is unresolved.

See the source-admission control

Coverage readiness

See what market-core coverage means, where provider extensions begin, and why New York is not currently claimed as production-ready.

Read coverage readiness

Source-Control Reperformance Receipt v7

For sophisticated finance teams, the event feed is evidence substrate—not another portfolio workflow. A bounded five-procedure receipt reports source admission, envelope/provenance integrity, balance-chain continuity, facility-document completeness and preserved exceptions while existing systems retain borrowing-base calculations, dashboards, approvals and credit decisions. It is not an audit, attestation, assurance engagement or AUP.

View synthetic source-control receipt

Source Integrity Control

See how canonical current-source observation blocks stale admission, preserves historical receipts, and separates upstream revision detection from billable customer control work.

View synthetic source-integrity control

Control integrity regression evidence

See the synthetic corruption corpus that blocked receipt v2 and gates receipt v7.

Open control-integrity evidence

Procedure applicability

Receipt v7 distinguishes required controls from structurally inapplicable checks and measures reviewer effort by applicable procedure/event.

View procedure scope

Pilot evidence modes

Separate a narrow technical-control proof from the multi-event workflow evidence required before claiming recurring economics.

See pilot evidence modes

Retained public-source integrity

Receipt v7 requires hardened canonical public sources to be frozen and byte-verified against the observed asset digest; this is reproducibility evidence, not source-origin authentication.

See public-source integrity

Pilot unit economics

Historical price/scope stress tests are retained, but DE requires 3–5 completed same-family events for serviceability measurement; 1–2 events are falsification only, with no live financing effect and no established price.

See the internal scope gate

Process-scope admission

Market overlap is not enough. A production event must match the specific interconnection process for which its source was admitted. For example, current MISO DPP coverage does not imply MISO ERAS coverage.

Earned process expansion

See why ERCOT Batch Zero ranks first for expansion demand but remains discovery-only until a purchasable control gap is observed.

View expansion gate

Private evidence control

Receipt v7 separates exact-byte verification from document-content review and origin authentication; matching bytes alone cannot satisfy SCR-04.

See private-evidence control

Pre-reperformance anchor

Receipt v7 can detect later whole-envelope replacement only when the original buyer-controlled manifest is retained outside the re-performance service.

See anchor/control-separation boundary

Use the buyer's existing repository

Receipt v7 exports a small anchor package for retention in the buyer's governed VDR/DMS. The product does not need to become another document vault.

See anchor-retention compatibility

Control-owner route

Where a formal Independent Engineer or Lender Technical Adviser owns draw-support review, use the v7 controls upstream as a borrower Source-Control Preflight Workpaper or as a bounded adviser input—not a parallel independent reviewer.

View synthetic borrower preflight

Economic proof gate

Downstream acceptance does not become savings without a documented baseline. Price exists only if measured buyer-value ceiling overlaps the measured delivery-margin floor.

See the counterfactual and price gate

Retrospective economics experiment

Economic proof now starts even earlier with control-seat discovery. Great Bay publicly operates third-party deposit posting/agency, so Geenex is no longer a borrower-preflight pilot. There is currently no execution-ready economic pilot; PowerBank / NY Green Bank is the first borrower-workflow discovery context, with New York coverage intentionally unbuilt until value is established.

See the staged experiment gate

PJM instrument-control boundary

PJM publishes the LOC rule/form layer too. The paid kill-test is now limited to private executed instrument/facility state and downstream reuse.

See the PJM instrument-state boundary

Commercial readiness gate

No target currently clears both control-seat nonduplication and technical/economic readiness. Discovery precedes pilot construction.

See the current external sequence

Project-scope admission

Public project pipelines are not borrowing pools. Exact financed project, utility, process and threshold identity must be resolved before a target-specific adapter is built.

See the project-scope gate

Public-information ceiling

PowerBank/NYGB public project-membership research is now stopped: the closing disclosure conflicts at 34 MW versus 50 MW and reviewed filing inventories expose no financed-project schedule.

See the conflict and stop rule

Economic prequalification

Before private data or adapter work, the current margin/value rules require a plausible path to measured value at least 5× delivery COGS.

See the zero-data qualification gate

Historical evidence lineage

Greenwood/Horning provides a public New York replay where utility funding milestones predate the lender facility. Preserve chronology; do not infer reimbursement or draw treatment.

View the public replay boundary

Public baseline vs private delta

Greenwood/Horning shows that public reconstruction is a data-minimization asset, not buyer value. Prefill public facts; measure only private actual-paid/facility/draw/review delta.

See the boundary

PowerBank control-environment discovery boundary

Control-signal freshness

PowerBank stays #1 for observed facility mechanics, while its March control disclosure is now historical context only after the June 30 reporting boundary.

See the freshness gate

Engagement label boundary

The default offer is source-linked factual reconciliation, not an assurance or default independence claim.

See the labeling boundary

Current route rescreen

Fresh August financing does not outrank explicit interconnection-use binding. PowerBank and Gridi remain exact-category #1/#2; KCE is the new adjacency #3 use-binding falsifier.

See the current route screen

Zero-data qualification

Five hard gates now determine kill/hold before any private-data path; DR/DS scope acceptance is non-compensating and the 5× hurdle cannot be passed conversationally.

See the stop-first qualification protocol

Contracting-seat boundary

Finance leadership can route a qualified workflow, but CFO/project-finance titles do not prove payer or WTP. See the contracting-seat gate.

Measured price-test gate

Historical price bands are not anchors. A future WTP test requires a measured COGS/value overlap window plus contracting-seat confirmation and owner authorization.

See the measured price-test gate

Delivery COGS measurement

Internal recurring-revenue gate

Exception-scope hard gate

First-sale commercial enablement gate

PJM TC2 commodity-value falsifier

PJM already publishes project-level readiness-deposit inputs and amounts due. Recalculating RD2/RD3 is not the paid wedge.

See the 15-case public corpus boundary

Serviceability economics

Productization requires 3–5 completed same-family events; 1–2 events are falsification only and no current price is established.

See the serviceability gate

Buyer-controlled private-evidence mode

The preferred future private cohort keeps source documents in a buyer-approved review environment and persists only bounded evidence-control/workpaper outputs. It does not bypass procurement and no named VDR integration is claimed.

See the synthetic in-place review proof

Delivery-family integrity

A same-state or same-SIR label is not enough for serviceability economics. DO requires a pre-content delivery-procedure signature before denominator reconciliation.

See the delivery-family gate

Bounded delivery closure

Contract-risk gate

Factual-only handoff schema compatibility

Delivery as-of completeness gate

Operative evidence before currentness

Operative-document-status gate: trusted ingress or a public form is not project-specific current-state evidence.