Shadow first. Price later.

Synthetic/internal commercialization protocol. Technical correctness is only the first layer.

Current first experiment

Use 1–2 completed same-family events only for cheap falsification. The first productization/serviceability measurement requires 3–5 completed events from one provider/process/form family. Historical Geenex / Great Bay PJM TC2 remains a clean single-process technical context, but no current target is an execution-ready economic pilot.

Sequential gates

Public scope fit → baseline capture → shadow v7 preflight → independent downstream disposition → counterfactual value → feasible price window → owner-authorized WTP → only then consider live/repeat use.

No live-financing intervention first

The first economics test should replay completed events in a buyer-approved environment. It should not affect a borrowing, deposit posting, eligibility determination or credit decision.

Data minimization

No live borrowing-base model, customer credentials, broad portfolio upload or unrelated documents are required. Unknown baseline work is allowed but counts as zero value.

Download synthetic stage-gate demo

PJM instrument-control boundary

PJM publishes the LOC rule/form layer too. The paid kill-test is now limited to private executed instrument/facility state and downstream reuse.

See the PJM instrument-state boundary

Commodity arithmetic excluded from value

The PJM TC2 shadow may reperform published readiness-deposit math as a reliability check, but that work contributes zero to the buyer-value numerator. Only noncommodity workflow effects may support commercialization.

See why